Nike Mercurial Vapor II Review
Bitey, featherlight SG boots that amplify acceleration on muddy pitches — ideal for pacey forwards, but narrow and not for firm/artificial turf.
Shortlistd Editorial
Editor
Nike Mercurial Vapor II Review
A bitey, feather‑light soft‑ground boot that gives attackers confident acceleration on wet turf — scores 7.6/10 but its narrow fit and SG‑only studplate rule out most firm or artificial‑surface players.
The quick answer
If you play regularly on soft, wet natural grass and live off pace, these deliver the traction and low weight you need for quick bursts and tight cuts. At £141.62 they’re a fair price for a specialist SG boot — worth it if you need aggressive grip and minimal bulk, not if you mostly train on firm or 3G pitches.
What we tested
The soft‑ground (SG) Mercurial Vapor II — the long‑stud soleplate version — tested in wet training sessions and a couple of competitive matches on rain‑softened natural grass. We evaluated grip, acceleration out of cuts, and comfort across repeated sprints.
What it does well
Studbing and traction: SG soleplate delivers decisive bite on muddy turf so your first step and pivot feel secure. The dedicated long studs are designed to penetrate soft surfaces and reduce slips during maximal efforts.
Lightweight, speed‑first feel: The low‑profile Mercurial last and slim silhouette keep weight down and let you accelerate with less drag than bulkier firm‑ground boots; you feel closer to the ball when changing pace.
Underfoot comfort without bulk: Foam midsole plus Air cushioning provides noticeable cushioning for repeated sprints while preserving pitch feel — you get shock absorption without a running‑shoe slab underfoot.
Durability where it matters: The traction‑focused outsole is built for soft conditions and resists the common stud wear you see on cheaper SG plates, so the grip holds up through a muddy season.
Where it falls short
Narrow, close fit — wide feet beware: The Mercurial last runs tight; if your forefoot is wide you’ll find them uncomfortable and cramped, especially during long sessions.
Not for firm or artificial surfaces: The SG studs are unsafe and ineffective on firm or 3G/AG pitches — these aren’t an everyday‑all‑pitch boot, they’re a wet‑pitch specialist.
Mixed durability reports on older reissues: Some users report sole separation or faster wear around the plate on older runs; if you’re rough on boots or play year‑round you may prefer a sturdier FG/AG alternative.
How it compares
Closest competitor: adidas Predator Pro (soft‑ground version). Choose the Mercurial Vapor II if you prioritise absolute low weight and explosive first steps on wet natural grass; pick the Predator Pro SG if you want a slightly roomier fit and a focus on control and durability. For pacey forwards who play mainly on muddy pitches, we’d recommend the Mercurial; for players who need a bit more comfort or play mixed surfaces, the Predator Pro wins.
Score: 7.6/10
Verdict — Buy if: You play regularly on soft natural grass and need lightweight, fast‑feeling boots that give aggressive grip for quick accelerations.
Skip if: You mostly play on firm or artificial surfaces or have wide feet, because SG studs and the narrow Mercurial last will feel wrong for those situations.
Buy it here: £141.62 — https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0CVQZBLKP?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&tag=tomisindev-20
Products in this article
